Radarspotters Forum
July 30, 2010, 02:10:46 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

Radarspotters Needs Your Support
x-click-but21.gif

News: SBS-1ER FOR SALE  SBS-RESOURCES 6.1
 
   Home   Help Contact Login Register RS Mainpage custom Outlines  

50th-banner-728x90.gif

ADVERTISE ON RADARSPOTTERS

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author
[NO] [CZ] [PL] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [AR] [RU]
Topic: Performance under virtualisation?  (Read 1012 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Fenris
Gp Capt
*

*
*

Reputation +426/-2
Offline Offline

Date Registerd:March 05, 2009, 01:44:35 AM
Posts: 254


« on: February 28, 2010, 02:51:10 PM »

Hi all

Over the last week or two I have been playing with Sun's VirtualBox on my laptop, and finding that it works quite well until I need to do something that is very CPU intensive which in this case is running the RadarBox software. When I do this the CPU allocated to the virtual OS is running flat out and the whole machine (dual core 1.73GHz with 4GB RAM) is pretty sluggish.

I'd be interested to know whether Aurora can shed any light on whether their software will be any better in this regard, I realise that it's asking a question that isn't easy to answer.

Thanks!
Logged

--

Brian

RadarBox owner and public beta-tester
Planeplotter Master User
junglejet
Gp Capt
*

*

Reputation +420/-4
Offline Offline

Date Registerd:March 20, 2009, 10:52:47 PM
Posts: 242


« Reply #1 on: February 28, 2010, 04:05:26 PM »

Virtual Software is always slow with graphics because DirectX or OpenGL need to be emulated. Even on hardware virtualized platforms there is no better performance because direct access to graphics hardware is lacking for good reasons.
Logged

3NM - a very good friend of Boris
dench
Guest
« Reply #2 on: February 28, 2010, 04:55:21 PM »

I guess the question is whether Aurora utilises graphics hardware performance, through DirectX or OpenGL, or does everything in software.

If it does utilise graphics hardware, then that's good when running native, but bad when running under virtualisation.
Logged
MichaelWaddicor
Sqn Ldr
*

Aurora Eurotech
*

Reputation +196/-2
Offline Offline

Date Registerd:June 01, 2009, 05:33:45 PM
Posts: 54


WWW
« Reply #3 on: March 01, 2010, 09:55:06 PM »

Hi all

Over the last week or two I have been playing with Sun's VirtualBox on my laptop, and finding that it works quite well until I need to do something that is very CPU intensive which in this case is running the RadarBox software. When I do this the CPU allocated to the virtual OS is running flat out and the whole machine (dual core 1.73GHz with 4GB RAM) is pretty sluggish.

I'd be interested to know whether Aurora can shed any light on whether their software will be any better in this regard, I realise that it's asking a question that isn't easy to answer.

Thanks!


Hi

Yes you can run our software in a virtual environment (We us a virtual environment for some of our testing).

However generally I would not recommend  virtual environments for any 3D software mainly due to poor graphic performance.

Also if your graphics card has hardware acceleration our software will use it, this is particularity important if you are using 2 or even 3 high resolution monitors.

Regards

Michael Waddicor.
Aurora Eurotech

Logged

50th-banner-728x90.gif

ADVERTISE ON RADARSPOTTERS

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Locations of visitors to this page
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!